Peer Review Process

This journal follows double blind review method preserving the reciprocal academic appreciation, respect and impartiality between authors and reviewers.

The peer review process:

  1. A designated member of the editorial board will make an initial assessment about the quality and suitability of a submission in terms of scope, originality and plagiarism. This assessment allows our qualified reviewers a better usage of their time and resources. Paper written within the guidelines regarding the structure of the paper is thus very important.
  2. Once the designated internal editorial board member is satisfied with the suitability of a submission, it is sent to two anonymous peer reviewers for their comment.
  3. The reviewer will assign marks and make comment about following six categories:

- Originality of the paper

- The value of the research question.

- The soundness of the methodological framework.

- Insightful discussion in the result and discussion section

- The implications of the paper

- Academic writing quality.

  1. The decision/remarks/suggestions will be communicated to the author(s).