FRIENDSHIP PROFILES IN SCHOOL CLASSES

  • Ante Kolak University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of pedagogy
  • Ivan Markić University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of pedagogy
  • Mara Stojanac University of Zagreb, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, Department of pedagogy

Abstract

Relationships between peers are extremely important in school, and the lack of friendship relationships or long-term difficulties in those relationships, alongside many other, may be reflected in a pupil's success, mastering of new subject matter, and result in a negative emotional reaction. The quality and quantity of their friends affect the pupils’ self-image, their self-perception, social status and success. Peer relationships with classmates may be diagnosed using the dimension of acceptance and rejection and using the dimensions of popularity and friendship. The authors of this study studied the dimension of friendship in the category of "best friend", in order to establish the variables which affect the choice of best friend. They defined the friendship relationship as a specific, mutual and two-way relationship between pupils, which is a reflection of the relationship between individuals, expressed in closeness and security. The aim of the empirical part of the study was to establish the profile of friendship relationships within a class, in the category of "best friend" formulated in the main research question as: "What is the profile of friendship relationships in the category of best friend?" The reply to the research question was considered through the variables of assessment of the number of friends, the ease/difficulty of choice of best friend, age and differences in age, the duration of friendships, experience of breaking up with a best friend, and establishing the causes. The participants in the research were elementary school pupils. The empirical part of the study was based on a qualitative methodology, and the instrument was an interview structured as replies to the survey questions asked. The results of the research indicate the difficulties pupils have in determining the number of friends, which is mainly between 10 and 20, the ease of choice of a best friend, the formation of same-sex friends in ten-year-olds, the preference for friends of the same age, and the class as a significant factor, where the first long-term best friends are acquired.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Asher, S.R. & Parker, J.G. (1989). Significance of peer relationship problems in childhood, In: Schneider, Attili, B.H., G., Nade, J., & Weissberg, R.P. (eds.). Social competence in developmental perspective, Amsterdam, Kluwer Academic, 5–23.
2. Benenson, J.F. (1990). Gender differences in social networks. Journal of Early Adolescence, 10, 472-495.
3. Berndt, T.J. (1982). The features and effects of friendship in early adolescence, Child Development, 53, 1447 – 1460.
4. Cairns, R.B., Perrin, J.E. & Cairns, B.D. (1985). Social cognition in early adolescence: Affiliative patterns. Journal of Early Adolescence, 5, 339-355.
5. Cillessen, A.H.N. & Rose, A.J. (2005). Understanding popularity in the peer system, Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 102 – 105.
6. Cohen, L., Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Metode istraživanja u obrazovanju. Zagreb: Slap.
7. Erwin P., (1993). Friendship and peer relations in children. Oxford, John Wiley & Sons
8. Huić, A. & Smolčić, I. (2016). Strategije održavanja prijatelustva i zadovoljstvo istospolnim prijateljstvima: efekti aktera i partnera. Društvena istraživanja, 25, 1, 63- 83.
9. Klarin, M. (2000). Odnosi u obitelji i s vršnjacima kao prediktori različitih aspekta prilagodbe u školi, Zagreb, Odsjek za psihologiju Filozofskog fakulteta.
10. Klarin, M. (2006). Razvoj djece u socijalnom kontekstu – roditelji, vršnjaci, učitelji. Jastrebarsko, Naklada Slap.
11. Kolak, A. (2010). Sociometrijski status učenika u razrednom odjelu i školskoj hijerarhiji. Pedagogijska istraživanja. 7(2), 243-254.
12. Legault, F. (1993), Gender differences in the Perceptions of Affiliate Networks in Primary School. http://www.eric.ed.gov/
13. MacDonald, C.D. (1991), Children's Awareness of their Popularity and Social Acceptability. http://www.eric.ed.gov/
14. Morgan, V. R. (2003). Classroom peer group acceptance and friendship: Links to self-concept and sense of school belonging in a developmental context. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, USA.
15. Parker, J.G. & Asher, S.R. (1993). Friendship and friendship quality in middle childhood: links eith peer group acceptance and feeling of loneliness and social dissatisfaction. Developmental Psychology, 2, 4, 611 – 621.
16. Putarek, V. & Keresteš, G. (2012). Tko je popularan u ranoj adolescenciji povezanost percipirane popularnosti sa spolom i usamljenosti. Društvena istraživanja, 21, 4, (118), 949-968.
17. Ray, G.E., Cohen, R. & Secrist, M.E. (1995). Best friend networks of children across settings. Child study Journal, 25, (3), 169-187.
18. Saenz, C. (2003). Friendships of children with disabilities. Doctoral dissertation. Department of Special Education, Northeastern Illinois University. Chicago.
19. Torrey, G.K. & Wright, D. (1996), Peer Behaviour Ratings as Predictors of Sociometric Status. http://www.eric.ed.gov/
20. Trbojević, J. & Petrović, J. (2014). Socijalne karakteristike dece koja uspostavljaju prijateljske dijade. Primjenjena psihologija, Tematski broj: Postignuća učenika, 7, 3, 493-507.
21. Turnball, A.P., Blue – Banning, M. & Pereira, L. (2000). Successful friendships of Hispanic children and youth with disabilities: An Exploratory study. Mental Retardation, 38, 2, 138 – 153.
22. Žic Ralić, A. & Ljubas, M. (2013). Prihvaćenost i prijateljstvo djece i mladih s teškoćama u razvoju. Društvena istraživanja, 23, 3, 435-453.
Published
2019-12-15
How to Cite
KOLAK, Ante; MARKIĆ, Ivan; STOJANAC, Mara. FRIENDSHIP PROFILES IN SCHOOL CLASSES. International Journal of Education TEACHER, [S.l.], v. 9, n. 18, p. 5-14, dec. 2019. ISSN 1857-8888. Available at: <http://ijeteacher.com/index.php/ijeteach/article/view/98>. Date accessed: 21 jan. 2020. doi: https://doi.org/10.20544/teacher.18.01.